20 Questions: Pokemon Style
1. It is a Pokemon.
2. It is evolved.
3. It is monotype.
4. It cannot evolve further.
5. Its type was not classified as special prior to the split.
6. Its type was introduced in Gen I
7. It is not a Normal-type.
8. Its base stat total is greater than 475.
9. It is not from Gens I-III.
10. It is not stage 2.
11. It is from Gen 4 or 5.

A stage 2 Pokemon is one that evolved twice from a Basic Pokemon, so it would be the third stage of any evolutionary line that does not have babies.
Reply
Rampardos, Mismagius, Hippowdon, Accelgor, Mienshao, Cofagrigus...
Is it used by any Gym Leader(Including rematches)?
Hmm... Yeah, that's a signature... I think I'll keep it that way until I find anything better.
Reply
^ Inqui, I think you're missing Cofagrigus from that list...

Ratio, in the TCG, is it considered a [Image: 20px-Fighting-attack.png] Fighting-type?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon.
2. It is evolved.
3. It is monotype.
4. It cannot evolve further.
5. Its type was not classified as special prior to the split.
6. Its type was introduced in Gen I
7. It is not a Normal-type.
8. Its base stat total is greater than 475.
9. It is not from Gens I-III.
10. It is not stage 2.
11. It is from Gen 4 or 5.
12. It is not used by a gym leader (including rematches).
13. It is considered a TCG Fighting type.
Reply
Is it Hippowdon?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon.
2. It is evolved.
3. It is monotype.
4. It cannot evolve further.
5. Its type was not classified as special prior to the split.
6. Its type was introduced in Gen I
7. It is not a Normal-type.
8. Its base stat total is greater than 475.
9. It is not from Gens I-III.
10. It is not stage 2.
11. It is from Gen 4 or 5.
12. It is not used by a gym leader (including rematches).
13. It is considered a TCG Fighting type.
14. It is not Hippowdon
Reply
Is it Rampardos?
Hmm... Yeah, that's a signature... I think I'll keep it that way until I find anything better.
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon.
2. It is evolved.
3. It is monotype.
4. It cannot evolve further.
5. Its type was not classified as special prior to the split.
6. Its type was introduced in Gen I
7. It is not a Normal-type.
8. Its base stat total is greater than 475.
9. It is not from Gens I-III.
10. It is not stage 2.
11. It is from Gen 4 or 5.
12. It is not used by a gym leader (including rematches).
13. It is considered a TCG Fighting type.
14. It is not Hippowdon
15. It is not Rampardos
Reply
Mienshao. It's Mienshao.
Hmm... Yeah, that's a signature... I think I'll keep it that way until I find anything better.
Reply
Yup. Congrats
Reply
Eh. Another pass.
Hmm... Yeah, that's a signature... I think I'll keep it that way until I find anything better.
Reply
I'll go again then.
Reply
Is it a Pokemon?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon
Reply
Was it introduced in an odd-numbered generation?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon
2. It was introduced in an odd-numbered generation.
Reply
Is it dual-typed?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon
2. It was introduced in an odd-numbered generation.
3. It is dual-typed.
Reply
Do its types have a non-neutral matchup with each other?
[Image: c1.png]
Reply
1. It is a Pokemon
2. It was introduced in an odd-numbered generation.
3. It is dual-typed.
4. The types have a non-neutral matchup with each other.
Reply


Forum Jump: